United States v. Thomas Jerome Lundy
United States v. Thomas Jerome Lundy
Opinion
Case: 16-10140 Date Filed: 08/31/2016 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 16-10140 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:02-cr-00043-MP-GRJ-4
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus THOMAS JEROME LUNDY, Defendant-Appellant.
________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida ________________________ (August 31, 2016) Before WILSON, ROSENBAUM and BLACK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: Case: 16-10140 Date Filed: 08/31/2016 Page: 2 of 2
Richard M. Summa, appointed counsel for Thomas Jerome Lundy in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel=s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct.
Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel=s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Lundy’s conviction and sentence is AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.