United States v. Miguel Rayo-Camacho
United States v. Miguel Rayo-Camacho
Opinion
Case: 16-10453 Date Filed: 09/28/2016 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 16-10453
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 8:15-cr-00362-JDW-AEP-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus MIGUEL RAYO-CAMACHO, SPANISH INTERPRETER REQUIRED, a.k.a. Miguel Rayo, a.k.a. Alejandro Gonzalez-Valdez,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(September 28, 2016)
Case: 16-10453 Date Filed: 09/28/2016 Page: 2 of 2 Before TJOFLAT, HULL and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:
Aliza Hochman Bloom, appointed counsel for Miguel Rayo-Camacho in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel=s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel=s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Rayo-Camacho’s conviction and sentence is AFFIRMED.
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished