United States v. Miguel Rayo-Camacho

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Miguel Rayo-Camacho

Opinion

Case: 16-10453 Date Filed: 09/28/2016 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 16-10453

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 8:15-cr-00362-JDW-AEP-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus MIGUEL RAYO-CAMACHO, SPANISH INTERPRETER REQUIRED, a.k.a. Miguel Rayo, a.k.a. Alejandro Gonzalez-Valdez,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

________________________

(September 28, 2016)

Case: 16-10453 Date Filed: 09/28/2016 Page: 2 of 2 Before TJOFLAT, HULL and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Aliza Hochman Bloom, appointed counsel for Miguel Rayo-Camacho in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel=s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel=s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Rayo-Camacho’s conviction and sentence is AFFIRMED.

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished