United States v. Miguel Rayo-Camacho
United States v. Miguel Rayo-Camacho
Opinion
Case: 16-10453 Date Filed: 09/28/2016 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 16-10453 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 8:15-cr-00362-JDW-AEP-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus MIGUEL RAYO-CAMACHO, SPANISH INTERPRETER REQUIRED, a.k.a. Miguel Rayo, a.k.a. Alejandro Gonzalez-Valdez, Defendant-Appellant.
________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida ________________________ (September 28, 2016) Case: 16-10453 Date Filed: 09/28/2016 Page: 2 of 2
Before TJOFLAT, HULL and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: Aliza Hochman Bloom, appointed counsel for Miguel Rayo-Camacho in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel=s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct.
Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel=s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Rayo-Camacho’s conviction and sentence is AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.