U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2016

United States v. Bah

United States v. Bah
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided August 29, 2016 · Marcus, Pryor, Tjoflat
668 F. App'x 860

United States v. Bah

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Michael J. Trost, appointed counsel for Mohammed Bah in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 *861U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Bah’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED. Bah’s motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED AS MOOT.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.