U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2016

United States v. Leipold

United States v. Leipold
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided December 15, 2016 · Carnes, Pryor, Rosenbaum
671 F. App'x 763

United States v. Leipold

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Jonathan Dodson, appointed counsel for Stacie E. Leipold in this direct criminal appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Leipold’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.