U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2017

United States v. Joshua Curtis Clark

United States v. Joshua Curtis Clark
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided January 17, 2017

United States v. Joshua Curtis Clark

Opinion

Case: 16-11543 Date Filed: 01/17/2017 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 16-11543 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:15-cr-00215-CG-B-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOSHUA CURTIS CLARK, Defendant-Appellant.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama ________________________ (January 17, 2017) Before MARTIN, JORDAN and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: Case: 16-11543 Date Filed: 01/17/2017 Page: 2 of 2

William Hughes, appointed counsel for Joshua Clark in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967).

Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Clark’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.