United States v. Cedric R. Monroe

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Cedric R. Monroe

Opinion

Case: 16-10944 Date Filed: 01/27/2017 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 16-10944

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 8:15-cr-00390-RAL-EAJ-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus CEDRIC R. MONROE, a.k.a. Ced,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

________________________

(January 27, 2017) Before JULIE CARNES, JILL PRYOR and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Case: 16-10944 Date Filed: 01/27/2017 Page: 2 of 2

Thomas A. Burns, appointed counsel for Cedric R. Monroe in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Monroe’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished