United States v. Cedric R. Monroe
United States v. Cedric R. Monroe
Opinion
Case: 16-10944 Date Filed: 01/27/2017 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 16-10944
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 8:15-cr-00390-RAL-EAJ-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus CEDRIC R. MONROE, a.k.a. Ced,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(January 27, 2017) Before JULIE CARNES, JILL PRYOR and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:
Case: 16-10944 Date Filed: 01/27/2017 Page: 2 of 2
Thomas A. Burns, appointed counsel for Cedric R. Monroe in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Monroe’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished