United States v. Neil R. Puterbaugh, Jr.
United States v. Neil R. Puterbaugh, Jr.
Opinion
Case: 16-14904 Date Filed: 05/22/2017 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 16-14904 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 9:14-cr-80227-DMM-27
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus NEIL R. PUTERBAUGH, JR., Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida ________________________ (May 22, 2017) Before TJOFLAT, WILLIAM PRYOR and BLACK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: Richard Rosenbaum, appointed counsel for Neil Puterbaugh, Jr. in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the Case: 16-14904 Date Filed: 05/22/2017 Page: 2 of 2
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Puterbaugh’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.