U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2017

United States v. Michael Sassnett

United States v. Michael Sassnett
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided July 19, 2017

United States v. Michael Sassnett

Opinion

Case: 17-10037 Date Filed: 07/19/2017 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 17-10037 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:15-cr-00082-JRH-BKE-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus

MICHAEL SASSNETT, Defendant-Appellant.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia ________________________ (July 19, 2017) Before HULL, WILSON and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: Case: 17-10037 Date Filed: 07/19/2017 Page: 2 of 2

Brendan Fleming, appointed counsel for Michael Sassnett in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Sassnett’s revocation of supervised release and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.