United States v. Brandon Wayne Bullock

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Brandon Wayne Bullock

Opinion

Case: 16-17380 Date Filed: 08/04/2017 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 16-17380

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 1:16-cr-00087-KD-C-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus BRANDON WAYNE BULLOCK,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Alabama

________________________

(August 4, 2017) Before TJOFLAT, HULL and WILLIAM PRYOR, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Case: 16-17380 Date Filed: 08/04/2017 Page: 2 of 2

Arthur J. Madden, III, appointed counsel for Brandon Bullock in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Bullock’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished