United States v. Ruben Antonio Santana Pimenta
United States v. Ruben Antonio Santana Pimenta
Opinion
Case: 16-16813 Date Filed: 09/01/2017 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 16-16813
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 0:16-cr-60182-BB-4 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus RUBEN ANTONIO SANTANA PIMENTA,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
________________________
(September 1, 2017) Before JORDAN, ROSENBAUM and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:
Case: 16-16813 Date Filed: 09/01/2017 Page: 2 of 2
Jose Rafael Rodriguez, appointed counsel for Ruben Santana Pimenta in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Santana Pimenta’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished