United States v. Cero Castro Cajado

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Cero Castro Cajado

Opinion

Case: 16-17188 Date Filed: 10/30/2017 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 16-17188

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 8:16-cr-00152-MSS-JSS-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus CERO CASTRO CAJADO,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

________________________

(October 30, 2017) Before TJOFLAT, JULIE CARNES and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Case: 16-17188 Date Filed: 10/30/2017 Page: 2 of 2

Mark O’Brien, appointed counsel for Cero Cajado in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of Cajado’s appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Cajado’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished