United States v. Cero Castro Cajado
United States v. Cero Castro Cajado
Opinion
Case: 16-17188 Date Filed: 10/30/2017 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 16-17188
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 8:16-cr-00152-MSS-JSS-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus CERO CASTRO CAJADO,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(October 30, 2017) Before TJOFLAT, JULIE CARNES and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:
Case: 16-17188 Date Filed: 10/30/2017 Page: 2 of 2
Mark O’Brien, appointed counsel for Cero Cajado in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of Cajado’s appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Cajado’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished