United States v. Hector Camirlo Espinoza-Guido
United States v. Hector Camirlo Espinoza-Guido
Opinion
Case: 17-10878 Date Filed: 10/31/2017 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 17-10878
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 8:16-cr-00348-SDM-AEP-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus HECTOR CAMIRLO ESPINOZA-GUIDO,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(October 31, 2017) Before MARCUS, ROSENBAUM and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:
Case: 17-10878 Date Filed: 10/31/2017 Page: 2 of 2
Rosemary Cakmis, appointed counsel for Hector Espinoza-Guido in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Espinoza-Guido’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished