U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2017

United States v. Vann

United States v. Vann
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided January 5, 2017 · Jordan, Marcus, Rosenbaum
672 F. App'x 974

United States v. Vann

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Richard M. Summa, appointed counsel for Wendalyn Ann Vann in this revocation of supervised release appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the revocation of Vann’s supervised release and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.