United States v. Prim
United States v. Prim
683 F. App'x 745
United States v. Prim
Opinion of the Court
Richard M. Summa, appointed counsel for Keith Terrill Prim in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and fifed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.