U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2017

United States v. Espinoza-Guido

United States v. Espinoza-Guido
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided October 31, 2017 · Carnes, Marcus, Rosenbaum
699 F. App'x 920

United States v. Espinoza-Guido

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Rosemary Cakmis, appointed counsel for Hector Espinoza-Guido in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Espinoza-Guido’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.