United States v. Joseph Andrew Spradlin

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Joseph Andrew Spradlin

Opinion

Case: 17-11629 Date Filed: 01/10/2018 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 17-11629

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 2:16-cr-00085-SPC-MRM-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOSEPH SPRADLIN,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

________________________

(January 10, 2018) Before WILLIAM PRYOR, NEWSOM and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Stephen J. Langs, appointed counsel for Joseph Spradlin in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

Case: 17-11629 Date Filed: 01/10/2018 Page: 2 of 2 appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no issues of arguable merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Spradlin’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished