United States v. Joseph Andrew Spradlin
United States v. Joseph Andrew Spradlin
Opinion
Case: 17-11629 Date Filed: 01/10/2018 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 17-11629 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 2:16-cr-00085-SPC-MRM-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOSEPH SPRADLIN, Defendant-Appellant.
________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida ________________________ (January 10, 2018) Before WILLIAM PRYOR, NEWSOM and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: Stephen J. Langs, appointed counsel for Joseph Spradlin in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the Case: 17-11629 Date Filed: 01/10/2018 Page: 2 of 2
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no issues of arguable merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Spradlin’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.