United States v. Homer Berryhill
United States v. Homer Berryhill
Opinion
Case: 17-12496 Date Filed: 02/01/2018 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 17-12496
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 2:16-cr-00011-LGW-RSB-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus HOMER BERRYHILL,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Georgia
________________________
(February 1, 2018) Before WILSON, JORDAN and BLACK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:
Marvin Paul Hicks, III, appointed counsel for Homer Berryhill in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
Case: 17-12496 Date Filed: 02/01/2018 Page: 2 of 2 appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Berryhill’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED. Accordingly, we DENY all remaining motions as moot.
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished