U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2018

United States v. Homer Berryhill

United States v. Homer Berryhill
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided February 1, 2018

United States v. Homer Berryhill

Opinion

Case: 17-12496 Date Filed: 02/01/2018 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 17-12496 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 2:16-cr-00011-LGW-RSB-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus HOMER BERRYHILL, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia ________________________ (February 1, 2018) Before WILSON, JORDAN and BLACK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: Marvin Paul Hicks, III, appointed counsel for Homer Berryhill in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the Case: 17-12496 Date Filed: 02/01/2018 Page: 2 of 2

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Berryhill’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

Accordingly, we DENY all remaining motions as moot.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.