United States v. Mickelle DeAngelo Bullock

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Mickelle DeAngelo Bullock

Opinion

Case: 17-13466 Date Filed: 02/13/2018 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 17-13466

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 6:16-cr-00253-CEM-TBS-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus MICKELLE DEANGELO BULLOCK,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

________________________

(February 13, 2018) Before JORDAN, JILL PRYOR and FAY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Case: 17-13466 Date Filed: 02/13/2018 Page: 2 of 2

Jenny L. Devine, appointed counsel for Mickelle Bullock in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Bullock’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished