United States v. Michael Robert Erskine

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Michael Robert Erskine

Opinion

Case: 16-11665 Date Filed: 02/27/2018 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 16-11665

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket Nos. 1:14-cr-00274-KD-C-1, 1:15-cr-00079-KD-B-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus MICHAEL ROBERT ERSKINE,

Defendant - Appellant

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Alabama

________________________

(February 27, 2018) Before WILSON, MARTIN and JORDAN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Case: 16-11665 Date Filed: 02/27/2018 Page: 2 of 2

Kristen Gartman Rogers, appointed counsel for Michael Erskine in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of Erskine and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Erskine’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished