United States v. Anthony Moore

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Anthony Moore

Opinion

Case: 17-14640 Date Filed: 03/29/2018 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 17-14640

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 8:07-cr-00090-JDW-TBM-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus ANTHONY MOORE,

Defendant - Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

________________________

(March 29, 2018) Before MARTIN, JULIE CARNES, and HULL, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Case: 17-14640 Date Filed: 03/29/2018 Page: 2 of 2

Anthony Moore appeals the district court’s decision to revoke his supervised release and impose a sentence of 6-months incarceration followed by 2-years supervised release. Moore’s appointed counsel asserts that Moore has no meritorious issues to bring to our attention on appeal. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967). To that end, counsel has filed a comprehensive 35-page brief “pointing the court to any argument which may arguably support an appeal.” United States v. Edwards, 822 F.2d 1012, 1013 (11th Cir. 1987) (per curiam). Counsel certified that he sent a copy of the brief and his motion to withdraw as counsel to Moore, and, on January 9, 2018, we notified Moore that he had 30 days to respond. As of March 16, 2018, we have not received a response from Moore.

As Anders requires, we have carefully reviewed counsel’s brief and the record, and we have independently determined that there are no issues of arguable merit for our review. See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744, 87 S. Ct. at 1400. Therefore, we AFFIRM Moore’s revocation of supervised release and his sentence, and we GRANT counsel’s motion to withdraw.

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished