Case: 17-13833 Date Filed: 06/11/2018 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 17-13833

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 3:16-cr-00161-MMH-JBT-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus GEORGE PENA,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

________________________

(June 11, 2018) Before TJOFLAT, NEWSOM and ANDERSON Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

The Government’s motion to dismiss this appeal pursuant to the appeal waiver in Appellant’s plea agreement is GRANTED. See United States v. Bushert, 997 F.2d 1343, 1350–51 (11th Cir. 1993) (sentence appeal waiver will be enforced

Case: 17-13833 Date Filed: 06/11/2018 Page: 2 of 2 if it was made knowingly and voluntarily); United States v. Bascomb, 451 F.3d 1292, 1297 (11th Cir. 2006) (appeal waiver “cannot be vitiated or altered by comments the court makes during sentencing”); United States v. Grinard-Henry, 399 F.3d 1294, 1296 (11th Cir. 2005) (waiver of the right to appeal includes waiver of the right to appeal difficult or debatable legal issues or even blatant error); United States v. Buchanan, 131 F.3d 1005, 1008 (11th Cir. 1997) (stating that motions to dismiss based on sentence appeal waivers should be decided at the earliest stage, except in extraordinary circumstances, to avoid depriving the government of the benefit that it has bargained for).

2