United States v. DeQuentin Thomas
United States v. DeQuentin Thomas
Opinion
Case: 18-10006 Date Filed: 08/14/2018 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 18-10006
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:15-cr-20529-JAL-3 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus DEQUENTIN THOMAS,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
________________________
(August 14, 2018) Before ED CARNES, Chief Judge, WILSON and JORDAN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:
Alvin Entin, appointed counsel for Dequentin Thomas in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and
Case: 18-10006 Date Filed: 08/14/2018 Page: 2 of 2 filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel’s request to appoint alternate counsel is DENIED as moot, and Thomas’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished