United States v. David Fiedler
United States v. David Fiedler
Opinion
Case: 18-10199 Date Filed: 11/15/2018 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 18-10199 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 5:17-cr-00009-RH-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DAVID FIEDLER, Defendant-Appellant.
________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida ________________________ (November 15, 2018)
Before WILSON, WILLIAM PRYOR and HULL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: Case: 18-10199 Date Filed: 11/15/2018 Page: 2 of 2
Rachel Seaton, appointed counsel for David Fiedler in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Fiedler’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.