USA v,. Richard Craig Heiniz

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

USA v,. Richard Craig Heiniz

Opinion

Case: 17-14460 Date Filed: 12/13/2018 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 17-14460

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 4:16-cr-00003-LGW-GRS-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus RICHARD CRAIG HEINITZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Georgia

________________________

(December 13, 2018) Before JORDAN, JILL PRYOR, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Robert N. Nye III, appointed counsel for Richard Craig Heinitz in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

Case: 17-14460 Date Filed: 12/13/2018 Page: 2 of 2 Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Heinitz’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished