U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2018

United States v. Berryhill

United States v. Berryhill
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided February 1, 2018 · Black, Jordan, Wilson
710 F. App'x 434

United States v. Berryhill

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Marvin Paul Hicks, III, appointed counsel for Homer Berryhill in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Berryhill’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED. Accordingly, we DENY all remaining motions as moot.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.