U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2019

United States v. Coywae McFarlane

United States v. Coywae McFarlane
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided February 15, 2019

United States v. Coywae McFarlane

Opinion

Case: 18-13235 Date Filed: 02/15/2019 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 18-13235 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 8:14-cr-00487-JDW-AEP-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus COYWAE MCFARLANE, a.k.a. Raymond Etabert Codrington, a.k.a. Kyle McFarland, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida ________________________ (February 15, 2019) Before MARCUS, MARTIN and BRANCH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: Case: 18-13235 Date Filed: 02/15/2019 Page: 2 of 2

The Federal Defender’s Office, appointed counsel for Coywae McFarlane in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). McFarlane responded and filed a motion to supplement the record. Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, McFarlane’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED, and McFarlane’s motion to supplement the record is DENIED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.