United States v. Coywae McFarlane
United States v. Coywae McFarlane
Opinion
Case: 18-13235 Date Filed: 02/15/2019 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 18-13235
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 8:14-cr-00487-JDW-AEP-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus COYWAE MCFARLANE, a.k.a. Raymond Etabert Codrington, a.k.a. Kyle McFarland,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(February 15, 2019) Before MARCUS, MARTIN and BRANCH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:
Case: 18-13235 Date Filed: 02/15/2019 Page: 2 of 2
The Federal Defender’s Office, appointed counsel for Coywae McFarlane in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). McFarlane responded and filed a motion to supplement the record. Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, McFarlane’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED, and McFarlane’s motion to supplement the record is DENIED.
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished