United States v. Dion Robinson

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Dion Robinson

Opinion

Case: 17-14923 Date Filed: 03/26/2019 Page: 1 of 3

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 17-14923

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 1:17-cr-20218-UU-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus DION ROBINSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

________________________

(March 26, 2019) Before TJOFLAT, JORDAN, and BRANCH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Case: 17-14923 Date Filed: 03/26/2019 Page: 2 of 3

Silvia Piñera-Vazquez, appointed counsel for Dion Robinson in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Robinson’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

2

Case: 17-14923 Date Filed: 03/26/2019 Page: 3 of 3 JORDAN, Circuit Judge, concurring.

I concur in the panel’s order. In my view, there is an arguable issue as to whether the 1989 and 1993 convictions under the pre-1993 version of Fla. Stat. § 893.13 qualify as predicate felonies under the Armed Career Criminal Act. But to the extent there was any error, Mr. Robinson invited it by executing a plea agreement in which he agreed that he faced a minimum 15-year ACCA sentence and by agreeing at sentencing that his convictions constituted ACCA predicates.

3

Reference

Status
Unpublished