United States v. Jorge Martin Pena
United States v. Jorge Martin Pena
Opinion
Case: 17-10566 Date Filed: 05/01/2019 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 17-10566 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:16-cr-20470-JAL-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JORGE MARTIN PENA, Defendant-Appellant.
________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida ________________________ (May 1, 2019) Before MARTIN, NEWSOM, AND ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: Neal Gary Rosensweig, appointed counsel for Jorge Martin Pena in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of Pena Case: 17-10566 Date Filed: 05/01/2019 Page: 2 of 2
and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967). Pena has received notice of his right to respond to his counsel’s motion, and has notified this Court that he does not intend to do so. Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Pena’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.