U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2019

United States v. Jose Hubert Palacios

United States v. Jose Hubert Palacios
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided August 12, 2019

United States v. Jose Hubert Palacios

Opinion

Case: 19-10001 Date Filed: 08/12/2019 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 19-10001 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 8:97-cr-00436-EAK-AAS-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOSE HUBERT PALACIOS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida ________________________ (August 12, 2019) Before WILLIAM PRYOR, JILL PRYOR and GRANT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: Adam Labonte, appointed counsel for Jose Hubert Palacios in this appeal from the denial of a motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a Case: 19-10001 Date Filed: 08/12/2019 Page: 2 of 2

brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the denial of Palacios’s requested relief under § 3582(c)(2) is AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.