United States v. Patrick Randell McIntish
United States v. Patrick Randell McIntish
Opinion
Case: 19-10131 Date Filed: 10/15/2019 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 19-10131 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:13-cr-00018-TWT-JKL-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus
PATRICK RANDELL MCINTOSH, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia ________________________ (October 15, 2019) Before WILLIAM PRYOR, JILL PRYOR and GRANT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: Case: 19-10131 Date Filed: 10/15/2019 Page: 2 of 2
William A. Morrison, appointed counsel for Patrick McIntosh in this appeal from an order of civil commitment, entered pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4243, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the order committing McIntosh to the custody of the Attorney General is AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.