United States v. James Kamisky

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

United States v. James Kamisky

Opinion

Case: 19-11602 Date Filed: 12/03/2019 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 19-11602

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 6:18-cr-00268-RBD-LRH-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JAMES KAMISKY,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

________________________

(December 3, 2019) Before WILSON, JILL PRYOR and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Case: 19-11602 Date Filed: 12/03/2019 Page: 2 of 2

Ryan Thomas Truskoski, appointed counsel for James Kamisky in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of Kamisky and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Kamisky’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished