United States v. Steven Dukes

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Steven Dukes

Opinion

Case: 19-10279 Date Filed: 12/11/2019 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 19-10279

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 4:18-cr-00022-CDL-MSH-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus STEVEN DUKES,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Georgia

________________________

(December 11, 2019) Before WILLIAM PRYOR, HULL and MARCUS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Case: 19-10279 Date Filed: 12/11/2019 Page: 2 of 2

Jonathan Dodson, appointed counsel for Steven Dukes in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Dukes’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished