Mark Edelsberg v. Vroom, Inc.
Mark Edelsberg v. Vroom, Inc.
Opinion
Case: 18-11317 Date Filed: 12/19/2019 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 18-11317 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 0:16-cv-62734-DPG
MARK EDELSBERG, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus VROOM, INC., Defendant - Appellee.
________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida ________________________ (December 19, 2019) Before WILSON, ROSENBAUM, and MARCUS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: Case: 18-11317 Date Filed: 12/19/2019 Page: 2 of 2
Before the Court is the parties’ Joint Motion for Voluntary Dismissal, pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b) and 11th Cir. R. 42-1(a), requesting an order “dismissing the appeal and all claims of Appellant Mark Edelsberg in his individual capacity against Appellee Vroom, Inc. with prejudice” and “directing that each party shall bear their own attorney’s fees, costs and expenses.”
The Joint Motion for Voluntary Dismissal is GRANTED to the extent that the appeal is DISMISSED and each party shall bear their own attorney’s fees, costs, and expenses. See Salcedo v. Hanna, 936 F.3d 1162, 1173 n.12 (11th Cir. 2019) (noting that when a plaintiff lacks Article III standing, dismissal “is entered without prejudice”).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.