United States v. Pryce Elijah Demars
United States v. Pryce Elijah Demars
Opinion
Case: 19-11146 Date Filed: 01/09/2020 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 19-11146 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 3:17-cr-00227-BJD-PDB-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus PRYCE ELIJAH DEMARS, Defendant - Appellant.
________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida ________________________ (January 9, 2020) Before MARTIN, BRANCH, and FAY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: Aliza Bloom, appointed counsel for Pryce Demars in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of Demars and filed a Case: 19-11146 Date Filed: 01/09/2020 Page: 2 of 2
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Demars’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.