U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2020

United States v. Antonio Gabriel Mitchell

United States v. Antonio Gabriel Mitchell
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided April 22, 2020

United States v. Antonio Gabriel Mitchell

Opinion

Case: 19-13897 Date Filed: 04/22/2020 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 19-13897 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 5:17-cr-00117-RDP-SGC-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus

ANTONIO GABRIEL MITCHELL, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama ________________________ (April 22, 2020) Before ED CARNES, Chief Judge, JORDAN, and NEWSOM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: Perry Russell Steen, appointed counsel for Antonio Mitchell in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant, because, in his opinion, the appeal is without merit. Counsel has filed a brief Case: 19-13897 Date Filed: 04/22/2020 Page: 2 of 2

pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Mitchell’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.