U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2020

United States v. Albert Joseph Scipione

United States v. Albert Joseph Scipione
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided June 12, 2020

United States v. Albert Joseph Scipione

Opinion

Case: 20-10962 Date Filed: 06/12/2020 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 20-10962 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 8:14-cr-00469-RAL-MAP-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ALBERT JOSEPH SCIPIONE, Defendant-Appellant.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida ________________________ (June 12, 2020) Before WILLIAM PRYOR, Chief Judge, GRANT and LUCK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: Case: 20-10962 Date Filed: 06/12/2020 Page: 2 of 2

Attorney Lynn Bailey, appointed counsel for Albert Scipione in this direct criminal appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw from further representation of Scipione, supported by a brief prepared under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Scipione’s revocation of supervised release and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.