United States v. Jason Scott Plumadore
United States v. Jason Scott Plumadore
Opinion
Case: 19-14701 Date Filed: 07/07/2020 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 19-14701 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 5:19-cr-00012-TKW-MJF-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JASON SCOTT PLUMADORE, Defendant-Appellant.
________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida ________________________ (July 7, 2020) Before MARTIN, ROSENBAUM and TJOFLAT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: Case: 19-14701 Date Filed: 07/07/2020 Page: 2 of 2
John Wilkins, appointed counsel for Jason Plumadore in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, Plumadore’s motion for appointment of substitute counsel is DENIED, and Plumadore’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.