United States v. Ramon Francisco Castillo
United States v. Ramon Francisco Castillo
Opinion
Case: 20-10233 Date Filed: 08/26/2020 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 20-10233 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 6:16-cr-00175-RBD-LRH
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RAMON FRANCISCO CASTILLO, Defendant-Appellant.
________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida ________________________ (August 26, 2020) Before ROSENBAUM, GRANT, and LAGOA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: Case: 20-10233 Date Filed: 08/26/2020 Page: 2 of 2
Ryan Thomas Truskoski, counsel for Ramon Francisco Castillo in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Castillo’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.