U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2020

United States v. Frederick Michael Pohl, Jr.

United States v. Frederick Michael Pohl, Jr.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided September 11, 2020

United States v. Frederick Michael Pohl, Jr.

Opinion

Case: 20-10005 Date Filed: 09/11/2020 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 20-10005 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 5:19-cr-00045-JDW-PRL-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus FREDERICK MICHAEL POHL, JR., Defendant-Appellant.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida ________________________ (September 11, 2020) Before JILL PRYOR, BRANCH and BRASHER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: Case: 20-10005 Date Filed: 09/11/2020 Page: 2 of 2

Lynn Bailey, appointed counsel for Frederick Michael Pohl, Jr., in this direct criminal appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Pohl’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.