United States v. Emmanuel Jimmy Saint-Mattis

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Emmanuel Jimmy Saint-Mattis

Opinion

USCA11 Case: 20-12736 Date Filed: 01/11/2021 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 20-12736

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 6:00-cr-00059-CEM-GJK-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus EMMANUEL JIMMY SAINT-NATTIS,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

________________________

(January 11, 2021) Before WILSON, LUCK and FAY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

USCA11 Case: 20-12736 Date Filed: 01/11/2021 Page: 2 of 2

Charles Taylor, appointed counsel for Emmanuel Saint-Nattis in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Saint-Nattis’s sentence is AFFIRMED.

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished