U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2021

Enver Kacevic v. State of Georgia

Enver Kacevic v. State of Georgia
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided January 15, 2021

Enver Kacevic v. State of Georgia

Opinion

USCA11 Case: 20-11895 Date Filed: 01/15/2021 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 20-11895 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:20-cv-00373-MLB

ENVER KACEVIC, DERRY GRIER, MICHAEL KEY, Plaintiffs-Appellants, versus

STATE OF GEORGIA, DEKALB COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, LINDA WARREN HUNTER, Judge, CLARENCE F. SEELIGER, Judge, Defendants-Appellees.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia ________________________ (January 15, 2021) USCA11 Case: 20-11895 Date Filed: 01/15/2021 Page: 2 of 2

Before WILLIAM PRYOR, Chief Judge, LAGOA and BRASHER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: Enver Kacevic, Derry Grier, and Michael Key appeal pro se the dismissal of their complaint against the State of Georgia and Judges Linda Warren Hunter and Clarence F. Seeliger. The complaint challenges judgments entered by the judges in dispossessory or foreclosure actions in the Dekalb County Superior Court. The district court ruled, and we agree, that the complaint is frivolous. Because the State of Georgia enjoys immunity from suit under the Eleventh Amendment, U.S. Const. amend. XI, and Judges Hunter and Seeliger enjoy absolute judicial immunity, Stump v. Sparkman, 435 U.S. 349, 356 (1978); McCullough v. Finley, 907 F.3d 1324, 1331 (11th Cir. 2018), from a suit for damages and are not otherwise subject to suit for injunctive relief, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, we affirm the dismissal of the complaint.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.