United States v. Lathomas Damondrae Tucker

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Lathomas Damondrae Tucker

Opinion

USCA11 Case: 20-13145 Date Filed: 02/16/2021 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 20-13145

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 5:19-cr-00481-LCB-HNJ-6 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus LATHOMAS DAMONDRAE TUCKER, a.k.a. Daedae Dadon Tucker,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Alabama

________________________

(February 16, 2021) Before WILLIAM PRYOR, Chief Judge, MARTIN and BRANCH , Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

USCA11 Case: 20-13145 Date Filed: 02/16/2021 Page: 2 of 2

Alison Wallace, appointed counsel for Lathomas Tucker in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of Tucker and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that Wallace’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, Wallace’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Tucker’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished