United States v. Lathomas Damondrae Tucker
United States v. Lathomas Damondrae Tucker
Opinion
USCA11 Case: 20-13145 Date Filed: 02/16/2021 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 20-13145 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 5:19-cr-00481-LCB-HNJ-6
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus LATHOMAS DAMONDRAE TUCKER, a.k.a. Daedae Dadon Tucker, Defendant-Appellant.
________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama ________________________ (February 16, 2021) Before WILLIAM PRYOR, Chief Judge, MARTIN and BRANCH , Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: USCA11 Case: 20-13145 Date Filed: 02/16/2021 Page: 2 of 2
Alison Wallace, appointed counsel for Lathomas Tucker in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of Tucker and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that Wallace’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, Wallace’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Tucker’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.