United States v. Julian J. Rogers

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Julian J. Rogers

Opinion

USCA11 Case: 20-13397 Date Filed: 03/17/2021 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 20-13397

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 1:19-cr-00260-KD-N-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JULIAN J. ROGERS,

Defendant - Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Alabama

________________________

(March 17, 2021) Before JORDAN, JILL PRYOR and GRANT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Kristen Gartman Rogers, appointed counsel for Julian Rogers in this direct

USCA11 Case: 20-13397 Date Filed: 03/17/2021 Page: 2 of 2 criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Rogers’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished