U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2021

United States v. Julian J. Rogers

United States v. Julian J. Rogers
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided March 17, 2021

United States v. Julian J. Rogers

Opinion

USCA11 Case: 20-13397 Date Filed: 03/17/2021 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 20-13397 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:19-cr-00260-KD-N-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JULIAN J. ROGERS, Defendant - Appellant.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama ________________________ (March 17, 2021) Before JORDAN, JILL PRYOR and GRANT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: Kristen Gartman Rogers, appointed counsel for Julian Rogers in this direct USCA11 Case: 20-13397 Date Filed: 03/17/2021 Page: 2 of 2

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Rogers’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.