United States v. Jamaal A. Hameen

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Jamaal A. Hameen

Opinion

USCA11 Case: 20-11363 Date Filed: 03/31/2021 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

Nos. 20-11363 & 20-12054

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 3:18-cr-00115-MMH-JBT-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JAMAAL HAMEEN,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

________________________

(March 31, 2021) Before LAGOA, BRASHER and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

USCA11 Case: 20-11363 Date Filed: 03/31/2021 Page: 2 of 2

Rosemary Cakmis, of the Federal Public Defender’s Office, appointed counsel for Jamaal Hameen in these consolidated non-direct criminal appeals, has moved for the Federal Public Defender’s Office to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeals is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s denial of relief on Hameen’s pro se post-judgment motions is AFFIRMED.

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished