United States v. Jamaal A. Hameen
United States v. Jamaal A. Hameen
Opinion
USCA11 Case: 20-11363 Date Filed: 03/31/2021 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
Nos. 20-11363 & 20-12054
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 3:18-cr-00115-MMH-JBT-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus JAMAAL HAMEEN,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeals from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(March 31, 2021) Before LAGOA, BRASHER and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:
USCA11 Case: 20-11363 Date Filed: 03/31/2021 Page: 2 of 2
Rosemary Cakmis, of the Federal Public Defender’s Office, appointed counsel for Jamaal Hameen in these consolidated non-direct criminal appeals, has moved for the Federal Public Defender’s Office to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeals is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s denial of relief on Hameen’s pro se post-judgment motions is AFFIRMED.
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished