U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2021

United States v. Jamaal A. Hameen

United States v. Jamaal A. Hameen
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided March 31, 2021

United States v. Jamaal A. Hameen

Opinion

USCA11 Case: 20-11363 Date Filed: 03/31/2021 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ Nos. 20-11363 & 20-12054 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 3:18-cr-00115-MMH-JBT-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus

JAMAAL HAMEEN, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida ________________________ (March 31, 2021) Before LAGOA, BRASHER and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: USCA11 Case: 20-11363 Date Filed: 03/31/2021 Page: 2 of 2

Rosemary Cakmis, of the Federal Public Defender’s Office, appointed counsel for Jamaal Hameen in these consolidated non-direct criminal appeals, has moved for the Federal Public Defender’s Office to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeals is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s denial of relief on Hameen’s pro se post-judgment motions is AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.